Geek Bravado

The blown hard arrogance of Parallax Abstraction.

Category Archives: Politics

Apple Can Do Better for Chinese Workers

With surprisingly coincidental timing, Apple today released a statement about working conditions in the Chinese factories they employ that has nothing to do with the recent This American Life story, honest. They’ve announced that they will now produce a continually updated list of all the suppliers they do business with and they have put an independent, non-profit organisation in charge of conducting audits of the factories. Sounds like good progress right? Well, not really. While it does seem like Apple is trying to take this issue more seriously, there’s a few problems:

  • The list simply shows a bunch of company names, it doesn’t list what factories they are using or even what cities or countries they are in. Saying you buy services from Foxconn is all well and good but it’s a company with nearly a million employees all over the world.
  • This Fair Labour Association they’ve appointed to do the audits has only worked with the clothing industry. One would presume they will read up on the high tech industry and the specific manufacturing challenges it has but was there no one with actual experience in the field they could turn to?
  • They claim the audits will be unannounced but these companies have ears everywhere and many of the audits where they “fix” the results are also supposedly unannounced. They did not address how they will overcome this challenge.
  • Neither the auditors nor Apple themselves will release which factories are checked, who owns them or which ones are found in violation of standards and how. The only way we will find out if Apple has stopped dealing with a supplier is if their name disappears from the list and we will never know the reason.
  • The audits will only cover 5% of the factories Apple deals with.

I bolded that last point because it’s by far the most important one. This organisation, contracted by the world’s most valuable company will be auditing a percentage of Apple factories so low that it is within the statistical margin of error for most scientific surveys. Could this possibly be any more limp an attempt at dealing with this problem? I understand that as a non-profit, the Fair Labour Association probably doesn’t have a Foxconn sized workforce and that Apple can’t give them the funding to hire more staff without potentially contaminating their results. Nonetheless, audits this small make the whole process look like a public relations gesture more than a meaningful attempt to improve anything. I’m sure this will silence some of their critics and the Apple cultists both in the press and the public at large will show that this is them owning up to the problem and cracking down on worker abuse. In reality, this appears to me to be little more than a smokescreen and an attempt to rile up their fanbase to drown out those trying to expose a serious problem.

I’m not naive and I know that working conditions in Chinese factories is not a problem Apple created, nor are they the only or by far the worst offender. Part of the reason why we hear about this so much is indeed because their products are so hot right now and get a lot of attention. Foxconn has many customers and was run this way long before Apple became their biggest one. I single them out here partially because the published stories are about the factories where Apple products are made but also for another reason.

With their historic combination of simultaneously being the world’s most valuable company who has massive margins relative to their competitors and their uniquely rabid and growing fanbase, no one on Earth is in a better position to draw attention to this issue and affect change than Apple is. For better or worse, almost all their competitors are in a constant struggle to just keep up with, if not surpass many of their innovations. If Apple came out tomorrow and said “We’re going to make a little bit less on each product we sell in order to ensure our Chinese partners pay their workers fairly and treat them with respect.”, that would start a wave in the tech industry and their competitors could be forced to make similar commitments, lest they look like cold uncaring corporate monsters which less face it, they all are anyway. Imagine if they also did something like give a free iPad to everyone who works on Apple assembly lines. According to Mike Daisey’s story, most of the people who build them have never even seen them turned on. If they suddenly got to experience the end result of their hard work and were told “This makes millions of people happy and we want you to have one for free because you’re a part of that.”, I think that would do wonders for morale by making them feel even a little bit of appreciation. With Apple’s profits, it would cost them virtually nothing to do this.

Many people in the world see Apple as the gold standard for technology and indeed how to run a company in general. I think it’s their responsibility to uphold the standard they set for themselves in everything they do, not just the things their consumers can easily see. They have a great opportunity here to make the world better for everyone. There will be some investment involved but frankly, they can afford it and the potential benefits could outweigh that. All we have now is a half-hearted attempt to look like they care when in reality, they’re just waiting out the news cycle Mike Daisey and This American Life created. It’s clear you consider yourselves better than this Apple, start acting like it. I think you owe the workers that much.

Amazing This American Life Story On Chinese Manufacturing Conditions

My preferred content to listen to at work is podcasts and as always, I start my week’s rotation off with the always fantastic This American Life from NPR. If you haven’t listened to this podcast, it’s a fantastic show where they choose a theme of the week (some specific, some often quite abstract) and a bunch of seasoned storytellers, authors and journalists tell a bunch of varied tales on that theme. Rarely can a show take subjects I would otherwise not be interested in and make them truly fascinating. In particular, this week’s episode entitled Mr. Daisey and the Apple Factory is one I think every Apple user–or really anyone who regularly buys electronics in general–should listen to.

Mike Daisey is a professional storyteller–and man, is he ever good at it–who is also an amateur tech enthusiast. He loves technology in general and in particular, Apple products. He is actually a self-confessed Apple fanboy, something I appreciate as owning your fanboyism is something I really think more people need to do more of (hinty hint the staff of Tested.com). One day, he read a story about an iPhone that left a factory in China with a bunch of photos still on it. All phones with cameras get test photos taken in the factory and they are usually wiped before the phone is sent out. The photos didn’t really show anything of interest but it made Mr. Daisey realise that he’d never really spent any time thinking about where his technological toys come from or what it’s like for the people who build them. What follows is an amazing tale in which he goes to Shenzhen, China and ends up finding out just how bad things are there. We’ve heard stories in the press before about poor conditions at Chinese factories but what Mr. Daisey finds is truly disturbing

I don’t plan to spoil the rest of the episode as I think everyone should listen to it in full. We’ve seen the occasional story in the press about horrendous conditions in these factories but the one consistent theme through them all is that things don’t seem to be improving to any meaningful degree and the companies that hire these Chinese factories really don’t care that much. Apple claims to be doing audits of their partners and ensuring that certain conditions are met but aside from the factories constantly gaming the audits, conditions don’t seem to be improving much and Apple (nor anyone else) seems to be doing anything to fix these problems. For a company that makes such massive profits on the products they sell compared to the rest of the computer industry, they have even less of an excuse to be so lackadaisical about how the people who actually make them are treated. No one has an excuse for this though.

I’ve known about this type of thing before and it does give me pause when I’m thinking what brands of products to buy for myself as I too am a big tech enthusiast. The reality is, this is a consequence of a culture that has been conditioned to expect to buy technology for about half or less the price that it really should cost. People feel bad about 13 year-olds being exposed to neuro-toxins when building their iPad but if the alternative is paying $1,000 for it (and most likely not being able to afford it as a result), it’s easy to rationalise your worries away. I’m not saying we should all stop buying electronics until China becomes a democratic utopia but I think it’s important that we at least consider where the things we enjoy start out before ending up in our hands. Seriously, take an hour and give this show a listen, it’s something every lover of technology needs to listen to.

America’s Latest Stupidity: SOPA

Before I go any further, I think it’s important to state my position on the issue of piracy in as clear a manner as possible because I don’t fully take either polarised side in the debate. Firstly, make no mistake: If you pirate content, you are no better than a thief. No, stop writing that vitriolic comment, I don’t want to hear it. If you are taking content for free that someone has asked you to pay for, I don’t care what ridiculous twisted rationalisation you’ve come up with in your head, you are no better than someone who shoplifts the same product off a store shelf. In fact as a pirate, you’re not only a thief but a coward as well since you are using the convenient anonymous shield of your computer screen to hide yourself away from those you are stealing from. I don’t care what piracy apologists like Mike Masnick and TechDirt say, they are wrong. Paying for something once and giving it out to others isn’t “sharing”, it’s mass theft. You aren’t protesting companies and their “obsolete business models”. It’s not their fault you won’t pay them. If the content is good enough for you to consume, it’s good enough for you to pay the asking price. If it’s not, then you don’t get to consume it. Period. I say this as someone who pirated a lot of games and music when I was younger. I was wrong and stupid to do it then and I don’t any longer. If I pirated all the media I consumed in a year, I’d have a lot more disposable income but I don’t believe in stealing so I don’t do it.

That said, I think many media corporations take idiotic approaches to solving a problem that is ultimately unsolvable, often at the expense of those of us good enough to pay for their stuff. Suing fans, increasingly intrusive DRM schemes, restricting what paying customers can do with their own media, it’s all stupid and pointless. When people have an easy way to steal your content, a certain group of them will always be entitled and selfish enough to do so. No matter what restrictions you try to put in place, you can’t stop it. Ever. These restrictions ultimately cause headaches for those that choose to willingly hand over their money to you. Making their experiences harder while the pirates still get what they want is how you turn paying customers into yet more pirates. It sucks that in the digital age, you have to accept piracy related losses as a cost of doing business but sadly, that’s your only choice. Reward those who give you your money and blow off those who don’t. Refusing to accept this reality only digs your grave faster.

Really, for a far more articulate version of this view, check out this awesome Extra Credits episode.

Unfortunately, we are now faced with the latest result of big media’s resistance to the inevitable: SOPA. I won’t spend any real time talking about what this is and why it’s bad because others like TotalBiscuit have done an amazing job explaining it already. It’s obvious to anyone but the media companies and the self-admitted Internet idiots in the US Congress that SOPA has very severe implications. It’s really the content industry cutting off its nose to spite its face. If SOPA passes, it has the potential to silence the industry’s most devoted fans who most want to drive awareness and passion for the brands they create. I believe this law will have the polar opposite of their desired effect. It may cause a temporary drop in piracy but it will also cause a significant drop in the number of paying customers. Between limiting viral marketing, fan communities and driving people to piracy to spite this nonsense, big media will simply further their path to irrelevance by spending money fighting their fans instead of creating better and more innovating experiences for them. Points like these is where I ultimately agree with the likes of TechDirt.

What offends me most about SOPA is that it’s a uniquely American piece of legislation, written and paid for by American corporations but it stands to negatively impact the whole world. Under this law, a site which is merely accused, not proven to be facilitating piracy can be shut down indefinitely by DNS blocking. You can look up DNS if you want more information on how this method works but the short of it is that a DNS block is not something you can get around. If your site is taken offline in this way, the Internet as a whole can’t see it anymore. The scary part is that this is the United States unilaterally deciding that if they deem a site to be facilitating piracy, they can remove it from the Internet as a whole, including from the majority of the planet that does not live there and is not subject to this law. Taken a step further, given how much of the core DNS structure is housed in and controlled by the United States, they theoretically have the power to take down sites that aren’t even hosted on American soil or operated by Americans. Think about that for a minute. If your favourite video site is simply said by some faceless media corporation to be a haven for pirates, under SOPA the United States could give itself the authority and the means to take that site offline indefinitely without trial, regardless of whether its servers, owners or customers reside in the United States. It’s not an exaggeration to say that this stands to fundamentally change the Internet as we know it and hand the keys over to people who don’t understand it and feel threatened by it. It will do nothing whatsoever to stop piracy and will increase it in all likelihood.

Most of big media is made up of American companies. But the Internet as a whole is not American. We don’t get to vote in congresspeople, we the majority of the world don’t have a say in this, yet we all stand to be subject to its consequences. What kind of arrogance does it take for these companies and the American government that puppets for them to think they have any right to censor the Internet as a whole to protect the interests of their increasing irrelevant media conglomerates? In many cases, I think it is purely ignorance. Congress is largely made up of old people who don’t understand technology and don’t care to. They only understand what their campaign contributors spoon feed them and of course, they are getting anything but the truth. In other cases, it’s just corruption. More and more Americans (and really people around the world) believe their voice is secondary to that of big business and when you see things like SOPA get anything but laughed out of the room, it’s hard to dispute that. In some cases, I do believe it is ideological as well. Many lawmakers take the viewpoint I did in my first paragraph but don’t also share that from the second paragraph. Piracy is a hot button issue but it’s also one where both sides have legitimate points and it takes a combination of both to come up with the most common sense solution. Blindly siding with the industry or the pirates is not the right approach.

The American political system is an embarrassment and it often seems that America is the only country in the world that doesn’t realise that. I come from a country where our parliamentary process can often involve name calling and fistfights in the very halls in which our laws are passed. We’re certainly not perfect either. However, never have I seen a supposed superpower have so many crucial problems with its economy, infrastructure, education, crime and many other things to deal with and yet spend their time fast tracking laws which unilaterally declare themselves the Internet’s police force. For a country that proclaims itself the “leader of the free world”, they seem to be going out of their way to suppress freedom that doesn’t coincide with the profit motivations of large companies. It saddens and angers me that those of us who don’t live in the United States not only have to worry about our own governments but now we have to worry about theirs too, even though they don’t represent us and we don’t have a say in their elections. The Internet is supposed to be about openness and freedom, the things America keeps saying it’s all about. If that’s the case, why does SOPA even exist and why do they feel it’s their right and responsibility to impose it on us all? This is your problem, solve it for yourselves. Most of the rest of us likely know better.

Needless to say, if you believe in freedom on the Internet, go here and do your part to stop this American stupidity.

Tobacco: Ban It or Shut Up

I don’t smoke and aside from trying and hating it a couple of times in high school, I never have and never will. I think it’s gross, smells awful and it’s bad for you. The thing is, the latter point is something everyone who smokes knows as well. I think it’s safe to say if you took 1,000 smokers and asked them if they knew whether cigarettes were bad for them, 999 would answer yes and the one that didn’t probably did so just to be an obstructionist. If you did the same thing with non-smokers with an IQ greater than their shoe size, you’d get the same results. I’ve always been of the belief that there are many things in the world that are bad for you and what you choose to partake in is really no one’s business, especially the government’s.

The concept of how smoking bans are applied is a whole other post’s worth of content. What’s irking me this time is the warning labels the government has mandated that cigarette manufacturers put on their packaging. Many governments do this now but Canada was among the first to implement such a policy. These depict the most graphic potential side effects of a long-term smoking habit and are required to take up half of the packaging on all brands sold in Canada. Today the Government of Canada unveiled a new series of labels, some of which depict late-in-life images of Barb Tarbox.

Barb Tarbox was a woman who voluntarily smoked her whole life but then became a mouthpiece for the anti-smoking movement after contracting cancer which took her life in 2003. If that last sentence sounds a bit cold, it’s because it is. I’m sorry she and her family had to suffer, I really am but I have a hard time feeling sympathy beyond that for someone who made a stupid choice and then feels it’s her responsibility to champion against everyone else’s right to make that choice for themselves. Smoking is a dumb choice but freedom means we have the right to make our own mistakes. Would Mrs. Tarbox have had her realisation had she not first contracted cancer? We’ll never know but the way in which she pursued her cause and used her afflication to rally supporters to her side strikes me as arrogant and emotionally manipulative.

These new cigarette labels are hypocritical of the government for two reasons. Firstly, many of them depict imagery of such a graphic nature that it would never be permitted for use on packaging for other products. If a video game, movie or music CD had images of a diseased lung or a cancerous mouth and tongue on the packaging, there would be a massive outcry and the products would likely be forcefully removed from shelves or at least, hidden from view. This rule apparently doesn’t apply when it’s something the government approves of. It takes otherwise inoffensive packaging that usually has little more than a logo on it and turns it into something purpose-built to shock and offend. It’s a double standard, it’s unfair and it shouldn’t be permitted.

Secondly and more importantly, it’s hypocritical because tobacco is the most highly taxed industry in this country and in fact, we have the highest cigarette taxes in the world. The government regularly increases these taxes under the false premise that smokers cost far more in health care expenses than they put in, something I’ve yet to see conclusive proof of. There’s no doubt that smokers do put a higher burden on the system and I think cigarettes should have special taxes on them, though the current rate is ridiculous. However, few things fit the definition of hypocrisy more than heavily taxing a 100% legal industry and then assuming the right to call its customers bad people and make them use their own packaging to do it.

Adding insult to injury, the very article I linked to which covered the announcement of the new labels has a link in its sidebar to another story that talks about how the labels have had no real impact and that smokers largely ignore them. Since the government also banned cigarettes from being publicly visible in stores, the labels have no impact on non-smokers either because they never see them! To boot, the rate of smoking in Canada has been on steady decline for years anyway. Seriously, am I the only one who thinks this is utterly ridiculous and purely theater instead of a real solution to a health problem?

It’s not and never has been the government’s mandate to tell people how to live and especially not to spend their money to do it. This is a role government has usurped and it drives me nuts how far it’s gotten away with it. They can’t have it both ways. If they were truly concerned about the real health concerns that come with smoking, they would ban tobacco. Sure, they’d piss a lot of people off (as if they haven’t already) but the problem would be solved. You remove the product, you remove the problem, full stop. This will of course lead to a massive black market economy as it does with other drugs that are illegal and shouldn’t be but at least then, they would have drawn a line in the sand. The current method of taking money with one hand and slapping the giver with the other is the government having their cake and eating it too. It’s not supposed to work like that.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 369 other followers